Planet Technology

News Technology

Motorola's compact Motopure H15 Bluetooth headset has a flip microphone, ignores background noise, and responds reliably to voice-activated dialing.

The $130 Motorola Motopure H15 is the only bluetooth headset I've tested with a folding microphone design. To talk or turn on the headset, you flip open the boom, which then sits on your cheek (a bit like a mini-clamshell mechanism); closing the boom conserves battery life.

The H15 is just a tad smaller than a chubby thumb. It's light and compact, but getting the fit right took a little while. Motorola provides various cushions to place over the earbud, and I settled on the smallest oval-shaped one available, which helped anchor the headset in my ear canal. Even though the headset did not feel 100 percent secure or comfortable, owing to my small ears, it sat unobtrusively on my cheek.

Read More......

Place this great-sounding Bluetooth headset straight in your ear--the Plantronics Discovery 925 requires no fuss or adjustments.

The Plantronics Discovery 925 Bluetooth headset ($150 as of December 1, 2008) was a joy to use in my tests. This model, which lacks an over-the-ear piece, required very little effort to place in my ear. With one hand, I just popped it in and settled it into place: It stays put, even though it has no earhook.

The secret? The tip sports an extra (but tiny) loop-shaped piece of plastic that sits outside the ear canal. This piece has a stabilizing effect on the headset, and helps prevent it from slipping out. I was surprised at how snug and stable the headset felt; even when I threw my head back in laughter, the headset budged not an inch. Likewise, it felt solid in its position when I walked around. Another plus: The Discovery comes with small, medium, and large tips.

The headset has a long V-shape, making it look a bit like an old-fashioned bobby pin. Measuring almost 3 inches, this model is the longest one we reviewed for our latest headset tests. As such, I was constantly aware of the Discovery resting on my cheek--but given how sturdy the unit felt, that feeling didn't bother me. (As for visual appeal, one observer thought the Discovery looked dorky. I don't agree, but that's just me. You be the judge.)

The Discovery's audio quality was top-notch. Call recipients reported that my voice sounded crystal clear, as if I were standing beside them, and one described the quality as better than that of a cell phone handset. When I turned up the music on my stereo considerably, however, the other parties could hear it; they said it was a little distracting, but not bad enough to drown out my voice. When I used my phone's voice-dialing features (such as "call Bekah mobile"), I had to repeat my commands a few times before the Discovery would get it right. At the edge of the range limit (33 feet), my voice sounded crackly, but calls did not drop.

Accessing the big call control button at the top of the Discovery was easy. The skinny volume button, tucked away at the back of the earpiece, was harder to reach; its awkward placement took some getting used to.


One bonus I appreciated is the Discovery's rechargeable carrying case. The case, which can also act as a storage unit, comes with its own battery; when I was miles away from a computer or power outlet, I was still able to give the Discovery a full charge for 3 hours of use (though the case itself, at that point, needed to be recharged, of course).

For color-conscious headset wearers, the Discovery comes in gold, black, and cerise versions; the accompanying charging cases match the headset color.

Read More......

The Aliph Jawbone Bluetooth headset may have a rugged look, but it offers excellent audio quality and a clean design.

When it comes to Bluetooth headsets, what's your definition of "sleek"? If you say it means "minimalist, understated, and textured," then the second-generation Aliph Jawbone fits the bill. But if you say it means "shiny, smooth, and dainty," well, cross the Jawbone off your list.

In my opinion, the $130 (as of December 1, 2008) new Jawbone is sleek--to the touch, and in the wearing. And I mean that as a good thing. The Jawbone topped our latest round of headset tests.

The front of the Jawbone sports a textured strip or outer shield, which looks and feels like a mosaic of miniature diamond-shaped tiles. To initiate or end a call, or to dial by voice, you press designated areas on the headset, going by touch alone--the Jawbone has no visible buttons. This is not a big deal, however, because the headset's design, which has a wide enough area on the surface, makes feeling for the correct portions easy from the get-go. And you're not totally left in the dark: You can see the indicator light (for the charging status, for example) through a slit in the shield.

In a nice touch, Aliph offers earhooks of four different sizes: two medium and two large (one pair is leather and the other is rubberized metal). And even though the earhook is fixed in position, it felt comfortable enough--and that's coming from someone for whom the earhook design rarely works.

In my hands-on tests, the audio quality impressed. My contacts reported that my voice sounded crisp and clear during calls almost all of the time. On one call, though, the person at the other end thought I sounded far away.

The new Jawbone's ability to eliminate background noise was even more impressive. When I made calls in two loud situations (one with machinery whirring and another with loud music playing), the call recipients heard only my voice. When I stopped talking, one person could hear something indistinct in the background, but couldn't tell that it was music; the second person couldn't hear a thing. Furthermore, I stood 33 feet away from my cell phone, and the other parties could still hear what I was saying, with only faint crackling.

Read More......
06.27

LG HBM-760

The LG HBM-760 is a basic and inexpensive headset with good audio quality.

The LG Electronics HBM-760 Bluetooth headset proved a pleasant surprise: This $60 model (as of December 1, 2008) stacks up well against the more expensive headsets we've tested--some of them more than twice its price.

Calls came through clearly and consistently, but lacked the sharpness of some better-performing headsets. Call recipients did not complain about voice distortion or echoes, but said some calls using the HBM-760 sounded muffled. Recipients also noticed background noise, specifically my funky dance music (with high-pitched female vocals and a good amount of bass), but they could still carry on a conversation with me.

As for fit, the HBM-760 did not feel terribly comfortable. The earhook is wide and loopy, so it did not wrap snugly around my ear. And the earbud is roughly the same size or a hair larger than those of other headsets, so I couldn't quite fit the earpiece in my small ear canal. Those of you with larger ears will probably fare better; a colleague with larger ears tried the headset and felt it fit just fine. LG, unfortunately, does not provide different-size earbud covers or earhooks--a feature I'd happily pay a little more to have.

The top of the HBM-760 has a dedicated power button that is easy to press while the headset is on your ear. The call button is nice and wide, and, although it is completely flush with the headset's surface, you can press anywhere on the upper part of the HBM-760 to activate it. The volume control rocker is harder to feel for, however. It's reachable with your thumb on the side of the headset, but the unit no markers or recessed indicators to help you land in the right spot; it took a couple of calls to get the positioning right.

Read More......

A slightly more affordable headset in the Plantronics family, the Voyager 835 includes a car charger, but has inconsistent audio quality.

Of the Bluetooth headsets we tested for our latest roundup, the Plantronics Voyager 835 ($120 as of December 1, 2008) is nothing to write home about: Basically, it looks like a plain black stick in your ear. Despite its boring design, its clear plastic earhook clamps over my ear nicely, providing a secure fit.

The Voyager includes a single earbud cover, but I found this was a smidgen too big for my small ear canal. The cover does have a spout-like tip, which helped anchor it. And the earhook's solid feel made up for the one-size-doesn't-fit-all earbud.

To turn on the headset or to start or end a call, you press the call control button, which is a narrow indented portion on the unit. Easier said than done, however; I fumbled around trying to find it initially. Ditto for the volume buttons. One side of the headset houses the volume up and down controls; the tiny "plus" symbol is only slightly raised, with the down button (with no marker) below it. Once I became familiar with the buttons' precise locations, my experience improved. Plus, I liked the solid feedback I got when pressing them.

Unfortunately, during some calls, recipients had trouble hearing me. My voice sounded either far away or hollow; other times, my voice broke up a bit. Occasionally, my voice came through more clearly--but it was never as sharp as the quality from its cousin, the Discovery 925. On the plus side, background noise was not distracting.

The $120 Voyager comes with a car charger, a terrific extra, but the device is still pricey, considering the limitations of the overall package: No ear wear alternatives and no USB charger.

Read More......
06.08

A slightly more affordable headset in the Plantronics family, the Voyager 835 includes a car charger, but has inconsistent audio quality.

Of the Bluetooth headset we tested for our latest roundup, the Plantronics Voyager 835 ($120 as of December 1, 2008) is nothing to write home about: Basically, it looks like a plain black stick in your ear. Despite its boring design, its clear plastic earhook clamps over my ear nicely, providing a secure fit.

The Voyager includes a single earbud cover, but I found this was a smidgen too big for my small ear canal. The cover does have a spout-like tip, which helped anchor it. And the earhook's solid feel made up for the one-size-doesn't-fit-all earbud.

To turn on the headset or to start or end a call, you press the call control button, which is a narrow indented portion on the unit. Easier said than done, however; I fumbled around trying to find it initially. Ditto for the volume buttons. One side of the headset houses the volume up and down controls; the tiny "plus" symbol is only slightly raised, with the down button (with no marker) below it. Once I became familiar with the buttons' precise locations, my experience improved. Plus, I liked the solid feedback I got when pressing them.

Unfortunately, during some calls, recipients had trouble hearing me. My voice sounded either far away or hollow; other times, my voice broke up a bit. Occasionally, my voice came through more clearly--but it was never as sharp as the quality from its cousin, the Discovery 925. On the plus side, background noise was not distracting.

The $120 Voyager comes with a car charger, a terrific extra, but the device is still pricey, considering the limitations of the overall package: No ear wear alternatives and no USB charger.

Read More......
06.05

The tiny and lightweight Nokia BH-804 Bluetooth headset offers a sturdy fit, but its call quality regularly took a hit well within range.

Smaller and far narrower than my stubby thumb, the Nokia BH-804 Bluetooth headset ($120 as of December 1, 2008) feels superlight. Of all the headsets I've tested, the 0.25-ounce BH-804 is the lightest--but not by much. (The Plantronics Discovery 925 weighs 0.28 ounce.) Factor in the headset's dainty size, and the BH-804 feels even lighter and, not surprisingly, very discreet.

You can place the BH-804 directly in your ear without the supplied earhook. It felt comfortable to me, even though the smallest earbud cover I used was slightly oversize for me. The earpiece shifted a bit when I bopped my head around, and it also tended to dislodge when I was walking and talking.

Turning the BH-804 into a hook-based headset requires some effort, especially if you're as klutzy as I am. I attached an itty-bitty strip--Nokia calls it the earloop holder--into the back of the headset, and then inserted the hook through the hole in the strip. After moving the hook around, I found a workable position, though it was not comfortable. The hook is like a wide-shaped U, with no give, so in my case it felt like it was just hovering there. I'll take the loopless version any day, thank you.

Call quality varied. Most of the time, calls sounded crisp and loud. Calls were equally clear in the car--the people on the other end couldn't tell I was on a noisy freeway. Great call quality is all very well, but I felt like I had to carry my cell phone around with me constantly to keep it that way. That's fine in the car, as my phone is just sitting there in its nook below the steering wheel. But at my desk, it was often a whole other story. On many occasions, when I moved away from my handset, 9 feet or farther away, call quality deteriorated rapidly. My voice sounded scratchy and some sentences became garbled. The BH-804 also did a so-so job dealing with extraneous noise: Callers could hear the music--particularly the beat--in the background, but we could still chat.

The BH-804 has two buttons: a multifunction key (which allows you to activate voice dialing, for example) and the volume rocker. I would have preferred the multifunction button to be closer to the top of the headset, but I got used to its placement quickly. The slender volume rocker button took a while longer to get accustomed to, but both gave good feedback when pressed.

Read More......

Earhook die-hards will like the Motorola H780's sturdy fit and comfort level, but expect the call quality of this Bluetooth headset to fluctuate.

The Motorola H780 Bluetooth headset costs $100 (as of December 1, 2008), $30 cheaper than its cousin, the Motopure H15. The H780 comes with a flexible clear plastic earhook and three ear cushions of different sizes. The smallest cushion felt comfortable and pretty snug.

I liked that the H780's earhook is small (relative to those of most of the other headsets I've tested), and it wrapped nicely around the curve of my ear.

I also liked the dedicated, sliding power switch at the side of the H780--it's always obvious whether this headset is on or off. The call button is too small for my taste, but the pressing mechanism is responsive. The volume buttons sport notches on the surface, making them easy to find and operate.

The noise-cancellation button sits farther down the headset; it's on by default, but you can switch it off if you don't need it (if you're in a superquiet environment such as an empty office). You have to be on a call to turn it off, though, and doing so doesn't save battery life, so there's no real reason to do so. This button is teensy, and I found it tricky to push with the pad of my finger (perhaps it's easier if you have strong, pointy nails).

In my hands-on tests, the H780's call quality was mixed. Sometimes it was very good. But even though call recipients' voices sounded loud enough to me, I sounded tinny or muffled to them some of the time, yet crisp and clear on other occasions. One person I spoke with was dismayed to encounter some reverb on her end, and she found it too distracting. Background noise, such as music, sounded faint when I started talking. I turned off the noise-cancellation feature when I was in a quiet environment, and for the other parties it was hard to tell whether the crispness in my voice improved.

Read More......
05.58

Jabra BT530

Wearing the Jabra BT530 with or without the earhook provides a secure fit, but its audio quality isn't consistent.

Putting on the GN Netcom Jabra BT530 ($100 as of December 1, 2008) involved minimal attachment hassles--a plus for those who like their Bluetooth headset to have an earhook.

The Jabra's default earhook is relatively short and its loop shape is narrow, which suited my small ears (the headset comes with a larger earhook that you can swap in, too). An efficient up-and-over-the-ear maneuver, along with a relatively quick in-the-ear-placement, was all it took to get going. Getting a good fit with the BT530 required just a little bit less time compared with the number one model among our latest headset test batch, the Aliph Jawbone.

Earhooks not your thing? The Jabra lets you remove the earhook entirely. Instead, you can switch out the regular ear gel for one of six replacement gels, each with a small loop that helps hold the headset in place. This versatility is great for fusspots like me (I generally find earhooks uncomfortable). Unlike the smooth round tip on the Plantronics Discovery 925, the Jabra tip has a beak-like portion that juts out--this is the bit that you put into your ear canal--so you just have to nudge it in somewhat before you're ready to rock and roll. Even with my head tilted horizontally, the BT530 stayed snug. And with or without the hook, the headset feels lightweight.

Getting the hang of the button layout took just a few calls. I prefer having the start/end call button near the top of a headset; in the BT530's case, the volume buttons are at the top, and the call button is too far down the earpiece for my liking. Before I became familiar with the layout, I accidentally ended a call when I wanted to increase the volume.

The BT530's call quality was all over the map: My voice sounded incredibly clear during some calls, but at other times the call recipients picked up on echoes and some distortion of my voice. The other parties sometimes thought my voice sounded hollow, too. When I was at the edge of the Bluetooth working range (33 feet), calls dropped before I could get back in range again.


Read More......
05.53

BlueAnt V1

Though the voice-control interface of the BlueAnt V1 is limited, this Bluetooth headset offers mostly solid call quality.

The BlueAnt V1 offers one feature that no other Bluetooth headset I've tested does: integrated voice control. The $130 (as of December 1, 2008) BlueAnt comes with its own voice-controlled interface, called BlueGenie. This technology, created by a company called Sensory, overrides your cell phone's own voice commands. (Your handset needs to support this capability, though. Check your phone's manual or its options to determine whether your phone supports this feature. Look for options labeled 'voice commands', 'voice dialing', or the like.)

The advantage to this approach becomes clear from when you initially set up the BlueAnt V1. Once the BlueAnt is fully charged and you turn it on for the first time, the headset's voice walks you through the pairing process. It worked like a charm in my tests. Sure, most people may not need a step-by-step, but it's handy for folks who might be new to the Bluetooth gig. (And it's easy to turn off the BlueAnt's voice control and revert to your handset's functionality.)

As soon as my cell phone and the BlueAnt were connected, the BlueAnt was at my beck and call. No voice training was necessary. I'd simply press the call button, and I'd hear, "Say a command." I'd respond by spouting "Redial" or "Call voicemail," for instance. Saying "Call GOOG-411" connected me to Google's free directory assistance.

When a call came in, I responded to BlueGenie's query by saying "Answer" or "Ignore." Other terms that came in handy: "Switch headset off," "Check battery," and "Call back" (this last command dialed out to the number of the last call I'd received).

The BlueAnt has a repertoire of available commands, and you can't go beyond the pool of requests it understands. This meant, unfortunately, that it couldn't handle instructions like "Call PC World office" or "Call Julianne mobile." The workaround? I could preprogram a handful of my A-list numbers to work with the BlueAnt's speed-dial numbers (up to five).

Despite those shortcomings, the BlueAnt picked up nearly all my babblings correctly. I was able to jump into voice control straight out of the box--not too shabby.

The fit was moderately secure with the default earhook, but not incredibly comfortable. You can go hookless with the BlueAnt; but without it the headset did not stay in position, and the earpiece shifted around as I shook my head.

I liked the position and the feel of the call button. It's easy to find--it follows the curve at the top of the headset--and it gives strong feedback when pressed.

Calls sounded good most of the time, coming in clear and close up. On other occasions some of my sentences broke up, or my voice sounded tinny to the other parties. Call recipients could also hear music I played in the background, but it wasn't distracting.

If you're in a noisy environment, you can turn on the Max voice-isolation setting (by tapping the call button once), which will help remove noise and allow you to keep talking. When I had my tunes blaring louder than usual, the person on the other end noticed a difference: The noise practically disappeared, and while my voice sounded a tad more robotic, it was completely intelligible.



Read More......

Though reasonably priced, this Samsung headset delivers mediocre audio quality, and the lack of extra earbuds and hooks limits its appeal.


One of the Bluetooth headsets we tested for our latest roundup, the Samsung WEP700 ($90 as of December 1, 2008) delivers only mediocre call quality, and it didn't sit too well on my small ears. The earhook's loop is rather wide, and better suited for larger ears. Samsung does not include an alternate-size earhook or earbuds. In fact, the WEP700 comes only with a charger and a user guide. (A colleague with larger ears checked out the WEP700 for size, and the overall fit felt secure.)

With the headset in my ear, the multifunction button--that is, the on-off/call button--was hard to access at first. I had to run my finger down the face of the headset to feel it; the smallish button doesn't immediately stand out to the touch. But after a few calls, I knew where to press. The volume controls are on either side of the headset; these were much easier to find, thanks to the well-defined minibuttons. (I just had to remember which side was "volume up," and which one was "down.")

Call audio on the WEP700 was middling or better. Sometimes my voice sounded pretty clear. Other times it sounded faint, but all my sentences came through fine and without distortion, according to call recipients. During one call, I received complaints about crackling and an echo. When I tested the range limits, my voice still came through 25 feet away, and it started crackling after that.


Read More......
Custom Search